Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 00:04
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What factors contributed to The Beatles' bitterness?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Starbucks Enters the Protein Wars With Test of New Drink Option - Bloomberg.com
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Average penis size has increased — and Ozempic could be to blame, experts say - New York Post
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What methods do private investigators use to investigate someone in real life?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All the ways Apple TV boxes do—and mostly don’t—track you - Ars Technica
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Anthropologists map Neanderthals' long and winding roads across Europe and Eurasia - Phys.org
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.